|
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ In other words, `first` and `last` would be grouped together and
|
|
|
treated as a single field, and `first.edge` and `last.edge` would be
|
|
|
grouped together and treated as a single field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Having multiple groups is fine but, when combined with `operator` or
|
|
|
+Having multiple groups is fine, but when combined with `operator` or
|
|
|
`minimum_should_match`, it can suffer from the <<operator-min,same problem>>
|
|
|
as `most_fields` or `best_fields`.
|
|
|
|