|
@@ -238,12 +238,12 @@ testing with your own data and queries].
|
|
|
[[disaster-ccr]]
|
|
|
==== In case of disaster
|
|
|
|
|
|
-For performance reasons, the nodes within a cluster need to be on the same
|
|
|
-network. Balancing shards in a cluster across nodes in different data centers
|
|
|
-simply takes too long. But high-availability architectures demand that you avoid
|
|
|
-putting all of your eggs in one basket. In the event of a major outage in one
|
|
|
-location, servers in another location need to be able to take over. Seamlessly.
|
|
|
-The answer? {ccr-cap} (CCR).
|
|
|
+A cluster's nodes need good, reliable connections to each other. To provide
|
|
|
+better connections, you typically co-locate the nodes in the same data center or
|
|
|
+nearby data centers. However, to maintain high availability, you
|
|
|
+also need to avoid any single point of failure. In the event of a major outage
|
|
|
+in one location, servers in another location need to be able to take over. The
|
|
|
+answer? {ccr-cap} (CCR).
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCR provides a way to automatically synchronize indices from your primary cluster
|
|
|
to a secondary remote cluster that can serve as a hot backup. If the primary
|