limitations.asciidoc 11 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257
  1. [role="xpack"]
  2. [[transform-limitations]]
  3. = {transform-cap} limitations
  4. [subs="attributes"]
  5. ++++
  6. <titleabbrev>Limitations</titleabbrev>
  7. ++++
  8. The following limitations and known problems apply to the {version} release of
  9. the Elastic {transform} feature:
  10. [discrete]
  11. [[transform-ui-limitation]]
  12. == {transforms-cap} UI will not work during a rolling upgrade from 7.2
  13. If your cluster contains mixed version nodes, for example during a rolling
  14. upgrade from 7.2 to a newer version, and {transforms} have been created in 7.2,
  15. the {transforms} UI (earler {dataframe} UI) will not work. Please wait until all
  16. nodes have been upgraded to the newer version before using the {transforms} UI.
  17. [discrete]
  18. [[transform-rolling-upgrade-limitation]]
  19. == {transforms-cap} reassignment suspended during a rolling upgrade from 7.2 and 7.3
  20. If your cluster contains mixed version nodes, for example during a rolling
  21. upgrade from 7.2 or 7.3 to a newer version, {transforms} whose nodes are stopped
  22. will not be reassigned until the upgrade is complete. After the upgrade is done,
  23. {transforms} resume automatically; no action is required.
  24. [discrete]
  25. [[transform-datatype-limitations]]
  26. == {dataframe-cap} data type limitation
  27. {dataframes-cap} do not (yet) support fields containing arrays – in the UI or
  28. the API. If you try to create one, the UI will fail to show the source index
  29. table.
  30. [discrete]
  31. [[transform-kibana-limitations]]
  32. == Up to 1,000 {transforms} are supported
  33. A single cluster will support up to 1,000 {transforms}. When using the
  34. <<get-transform,GET {transforms} API>> a total `count` of {transforms}
  35. is returned. Use the `size` and `from` parameters to enumerate through the full
  36. list.
  37. [discrete]
  38. [[transform-aggresponse-limitations]]
  39. == Aggregation responses may be incompatible with destination index mappings
  40. When a {transform} is first started, it will deduce the mappings
  41. required for the destination index. This process is based on the field types of
  42. the source index and the aggregations used. If the fields are derived from
  43. <<search-aggregations-metrics-scripted-metric-aggregation,`scripted_metrics`>>
  44. or <<search-aggregations-pipeline-bucket-script-aggregation,`bucket_scripts`>>,
  45. <<dynamic-mapping,dynamic mappings>> will be used. In some instances the
  46. deduced mappings may be incompatible with the actual data. For example, numeric
  47. overflows might occur or dynamically mapped fields might contain both numbers
  48. and strings. Please check {es} logs if you think this may have occurred.
  49. You can view the deduced mappings by using the
  50. https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/preview-transform.html[Preview transform API].
  51. See the `generated_dest_index` object in the API response.
  52. If it's required, you may define custom mappings prior to starting the
  53. {transform} by creating a custom destination index using the
  54. https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/indices-create-index.html[Create index API].
  55. As deduced mappings cannot be overwritten by an index template, use the Create
  56. index API to define custom mappings. The index templates only apply to fields
  57. derived from scripts that use dynamic mappings.
  58. [discrete]
  59. [[transform-batch-limitations]]
  60. == Batch {transforms} may not account for changed documents
  61. A batch {transform} uses a
  62. <<search-aggregations-bucket-composite-aggregation,composite aggregation>>
  63. which allows efficient pagination through all buckets. Composite aggregations
  64. do not yet support a search context, therefore if the source data is changed
  65. (deleted, updated, added) while the batch {dataframe} is in progress, then the
  66. results may not include these changes.
  67. [discrete]
  68. [[transform-consistency-limitations]]
  69. == {ctransform-cap} consistency does not account for deleted or updated documents
  70. While the process for {transforms} allows the continual recalculation of the
  71. {transform} as new data is being ingested, it does also have some limitations.
  72. Changed entities will only be identified if their time field has also been
  73. updated and falls within the range of the action to check for changes. This has
  74. been designed in principle for, and is suited to, the use case where new data is
  75. given a timestamp for the time of ingest.
  76. If the indices that fall within the scope of the source index pattern are
  77. removed, for example when deleting historical time-based indices, then the
  78. composite aggregation performed in consecutive checkpoint processing will search
  79. over different source data, and entities that only existed in the deleted index
  80. will not be removed from the {dataframe} destination index.
  81. Depending on your use case, you may wish to recreate the {transform} entirely
  82. after deletions. Alternatively, if your use case is tolerant to historical
  83. archiving, you may wish to include a max ingest timestamp in your aggregation.
  84. This will allow you to exclude results that have not been recently updated when
  85. viewing the destination index.
  86. [discrete]
  87. [[transform-deletion-limitations]]
  88. == Deleting a {transform} does not delete the destination index or {kib} index pattern
  89. When deleting a {transform} using `DELETE _transform/index`
  90. neither the destination index nor the {kib} index pattern, should one have been
  91. created, are deleted. These objects must be deleted separately.
  92. [discrete]
  93. [[transform-aggregation-page-limitations]]
  94. == Handling dynamic adjustment of aggregation page size
  95. During the development of {transforms}, control was favoured over performance.
  96. In the design considerations, it is preferred for the {transform} to take longer
  97. to complete quietly in the background rather than to finish quickly and take
  98. precedence in resource consumption.
  99. Composite aggregations are well suited for high cardinality data enabling
  100. pagination through results. If a <<circuit-breaker,circuit breaker>> memory
  101. exception occurs when performing the composite aggregated search then we try
  102. again reducing the number of buckets requested. This circuit breaker is
  103. calculated based upon all activity within the cluster, not just activity from
  104. {transforms}, so it therefore may only be a temporary resource
  105. availability issue.
  106. For a batch {transform}, the number of buckets requested is only ever adjusted
  107. downwards. The lowering of value may result in a longer duration for the
  108. {transform} checkpoint to complete. For {ctransforms}, the number of buckets
  109. requested is reset back to its default at the start of every checkpoint and it
  110. is possible for circuit breaker exceptions to occur repeatedly in the {es} logs.
  111. The {transform} retrieves data in batches which means it calculates several
  112. buckets at once. Per default this is 500 buckets per search/index operation. The
  113. default can be changed using `max_page_search_size` and the minimum value is 10.
  114. If failures still occur once the number of buckets requested has been reduced to
  115. its minimum, then the {transform} will be set to a failed state.
  116. [discrete]
  117. [[transform-dynamic-adjustments-limitations]]
  118. == Handling dynamic adjustments for many terms
  119. For each checkpoint, entities are identified that have changed since the last
  120. time the check was performed. This list of changed entities is supplied as a
  121. <<query-dsl-terms-query,terms query>> to the {transform} composite aggregation,
  122. one page at a time. Then updates are applied to the destination index for each
  123. page of entities.
  124. The page `size` is defined by `max_page_search_size` which is also used to
  125. define the number of buckets returned by the composite aggregation search. The
  126. default value is 500, the minimum is 10.
  127. The index setting <<dynamic-index-settings,`index.max_terms_count`>> defines
  128. the maximum number of terms that can be used in a terms query. The default value
  129. is 65536. If `max_page_search_size` exceeds `index.max_terms_count` the
  130. {transform} will fail.
  131. Using smaller values for `max_page_search_size` may result in a longer duration
  132. for the {transform} checkpoint to complete.
  133. [discrete]
  134. [[transform-scheduling-limitations]]
  135. == {ctransform-cap} scheduling limitations
  136. A {ctransform} periodically checks for changes to source data. The functionality
  137. of the scheduler is currently limited to a basic periodic timer which can be
  138. within the `frequency` range from 1s to 1h. The default is 1m. This is designed
  139. to run little and often. When choosing a `frequency` for this timer consider
  140. your ingest rate along with the impact that the {transform}
  141. search/index operations has other users in your cluster. Also note that retries
  142. occur at `frequency` interval.
  143. [discrete]
  144. [[transform-failed-limitations]]
  145. == Handling of failed {transforms}
  146. Failed {transforms} remain as a persistent task and should be handled
  147. appropriately, either by deleting it or by resolving the root cause of the
  148. failure and re-starting.
  149. When using the API to delete a failed {transform}, first stop it using
  150. `_stop?force=true`, then delete it.
  151. [discrete]
  152. [[transform-availability-limitations]]
  153. == {ctransforms-cap} may give incorrect results if documents are not yet available to search
  154. After a document is indexed, there is a very small delay until it is available
  155. to search.
  156. A {ctransform} periodically checks for changed entities between the time since
  157. it last checked and `now` minus `sync.time.delay`. This time window moves
  158. without overlapping. If the timestamp of a recently indexed document falls
  159. within this time window but this document is not yet available to search then
  160. this entity will not be updated.
  161. If using a `sync.time.field` that represents the data ingest time and using a
  162. zero second or very small `sync.time.delay`, then it is more likely that this
  163. issue will occur.
  164. [discrete]
  165. [[transform-date-nanos]]
  166. == Support for date nanoseconds data type
  167. If your data uses the <<date_nanos,date nanosecond data type>>, aggregations
  168. are nonetheless on millisecond resolution. This limitation also affects the
  169. aggregations in your {transforms}.
  170. [discrete]
  171. [[transform-data-streams-destination]]
  172. == Data streams as destination indices are not supported
  173. {transforms-cap} update data in the destination index which requires writing
  174. into the destination. <<data-streams>> are designed to be append-only, which
  175. means you cannot send update or delete requests directly to a data stream. For
  176. this reason, data streams are not supported as destination indices for
  177. {transforms}.
  178. [discrete]
  179. [[transform-ilm-destination]]
  180. == ILM as destination index may cause duplicated documents
  181. <<index-lifecycle-management,ILM>> is not recommended to use as a {transform}
  182. destination index. {transforms-cap} update documents in the current destination,
  183. and cannot delete documents in the indices previously used by ILM. This may lead
  184. to duplicated documents when you use {transforms} combined with ILM in case of a
  185. rollover.
  186. If you use ILM to have time-based indices, please consider using the
  187. <<date-index-name-processor>> instead. The processor works without duplicated
  188. documents if your {transform} contains a `group_by` based on `date_histogram`.
  189. [discrete]
  190. [[transform-painless-imitation]]
  191. == Using scripts in {transforms}
  192. {transforms-cap} support scripting in every case when aggregations support them.
  193. However, there are certain factors you might want to consider when using scripts
  194. in {transforms}:
  195. * {transforms-cap} cannot deduce index mappings for output fields when the
  196. fields are created by a script. In this case, you might want to create the
  197. mappings of the destination index yourself prior to creating the transform.
  198. * Scripted fields may increase the runtime of the {transform}.
  199. * {transforms-cap} cannot optimize queries when you use scripts for all the
  200. groupings defined in `group_by`, you will receive a warning message when you
  201. use scripts this way.