| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102 | [[disk-allocator]]=== Disk-based shard allocationElasticsearch considers the available disk space on a node before decidingwhether to allocate new shards to that node or to actively relocate shards awayfrom that node.Below are the settings that can be configured in the `elasticsearch.yml` configfile or updated dynamically on a live cluster with the<<cluster-update-settings,cluster-update-settings>> API:`cluster.routing.allocation.disk.threshold_enabled`::    Defaults to `true`.  Set to `false` to disable the disk allocation decider.`cluster.routing.allocation.disk.watermark.low`::    Controls the low watermark for disk usage. It defaults to `85%`, meaning    that Elasticsearch will not allocate shards to nodes that have more than    85% disk used. It can also be set to an absolute byte value (like `500mb`)    to prevent Elasticsearch from allocating shards if less than the specified    amount of space is available. This setting has no effect on the primary    shards of newly-created indices but will prevent their replicas from being allocated.`cluster.routing.allocation.disk.watermark.high`::    Controls the high watermark. It defaults to `90%`, meaning that    Elasticsearch will attempt to relocate shards away from a node whose disk    usage is above 90%. It can also be set to an absolute byte value (similarly    to the low watermark) to relocate shards away from a node if it has less    than the specified amount of free space. This setting affects the    allocation of all shards, whether previously allocated or not.`cluster.routing.allocation.disk.watermark.flood_stage`::+--Controls the flood stage watermark. It defaults to 95%, meaning thatElasticsearch enforces a read-only index block(`index.blocks.read_only_allow_delete`) on every index that has one or moreshards allocated on the node that has at least one disk exceeding the floodstage. This is a last resort to prevent nodes from running out of disk space.The index block is automatically released once the disk utilization falls belowthe high watermark.NOTE: You can not mix the usage of percentage values and byte values withinthese settings. Either all are set to percentage values, or all are set to bytevalues. This is so that we can we validate that the settings are internallyconsistent (that is, the low disk threshold is not more than the high diskthreshold, and the high disk threshold is not more than the flood stagethreshold).An example of resetting the read-only index block on the `twitter` index:[source,console]--------------------------------------------------PUT /twitter/_settings{  "index.blocks.read_only_allow_delete": null}--------------------------------------------------// TEST[setup:twitter]--`cluster.info.update.interval`::    How often Elasticsearch should check on disk usage for each node in the    cluster. Defaults to `30s`.NOTE: Percentage values refer to used disk space, while byte values refer tofree disk space. This can be confusing, since it flips the meaning of high andlow. For example, it makes sense to set the low watermark to 10gb and the highwatermark to 5gb, but not the other way around.An example of updating the low watermark to at least 100 gigabytes free, a highwatermark of at least 50 gigabytes free, and a flood stage watermark of 10gigabytes free, and updating the information about the cluster every minute:[source,console]--------------------------------------------------PUT _cluster/settings{  "transient": {    "cluster.routing.allocation.disk.watermark.low": "100gb",    "cluster.routing.allocation.disk.watermark.high": "50gb",    "cluster.routing.allocation.disk.watermark.flood_stage": "10gb",    "cluster.info.update.interval": "1m"  }}--------------------------------------------------{es} accounts for the future disk usage of ongoing shard relocations andrecoveries to help prevent these shard movements from breaching a watermark.This mechanism may double-count some data that has already been relocated ontoa node. For instance, if a relocation of a 100GB shard is 90% complete then{es} has copied 90GB of data onto the target node. This 90GB consumes diskspace and will be reflected in the node's disk usage statistics. However {es}also treats the relocation as if it will consume another full 100GB in thefuture, even though the shard may really only consume a further 10GB of space.If the node's disks are close to a watermark then this may temporarily preventother shards from moving onto the same node. Eventually the relocation willcomplete and then {es} will use the node's true disk usage statistics again.
 |