elasticsearch/docs/reference/how-to/size-your-shards.asciidoc

[[size-your-shards]]
== How to size your shards
++++
<titleabbrev>Size your shards</titleabbrev>
++++

To protect against hardware failure and increase capacity, {es} stores copies of
an index’s data across multiple shards on multiple nodes. The number and size of
these shards can have a significant impact on your cluster's health. One common
problem is _oversharding_, a situation in which a cluster with a large number of
shards becomes unstable.

[discrete]
[[create-a-sharding-strategy]]
=== Create a sharding strategy

The best way to prevent oversharding and other shard-related issues
is to create a sharding strategy. A sharding strategy helps you determine and
maintain the optimal number of shards for your cluster while limiting the size
of those shards.

Unfortunately, there is no one-size-fits-all sharding strategy. A strategy that
works in one environment may not scale in another. A good sharding strategy must
account for your infrastructure, use case, and performance expectations.

The best way to create a sharding strategy is to benchmark your production data
on production hardware using the same queries and indexing loads you'd see in
production. For our recommended methodology, watch the
https://www.elastic.co/elasticon/conf/2016/sf/quantitative-cluster-sizing[quantitative
cluster sizing video]. As you test different shard configurations, use {kib}'s
{kibana-ref}/elasticsearch-metrics.html[{es} monitoring tools] to track your
cluster's stability and performance.

The following sections provide some reminders and guidelines you should consider
when designing your sharding strategy. If your cluster has shard-related
problems, see <<fix-an-oversharded-cluster>>.

[discrete]
[[shard-sizing-considerations]]
=== Sizing considerations

Keep the following things in mind when building your sharding strategy.

[discrete]
[[single-thread-per-shard]]
==== Searches run on a single thread per shard

Most searches hit multiple shards. Each shard runs the search on a single
CPU thread. While a shard can run multiple concurrent searches, searches across a
large number of shards can deplete a node's <<modules-threadpool,search
thread pool>>. This can result in low throughput and slow search speeds.

[discrete]
[[each-shard-has-overhead]]
==== Each shard has overhead

Every shard uses memory and CPU resources. In most cases, a small
set of large shards uses fewer resources than many small shards.

Segments play a big role in a shard's resource usage. Most shards contain
several segments, which store its index data. {es} keeps segment metadata in
<<heap-size,heap memory>> so it can be quickly retrieved for searches. As a
shard grows, its segments are <<index-modules-merge,merged>> into fewer, larger
segments. This decreases the number of segments, which means less metadata is
kept in heap memory.

[discrete]
[[shard-auto-balance]]
==== {es} automatically balances shards within a data tier

A cluster's nodes are grouped into data tiers. Within each tier, {es}
attempts to spread an index's shards across as many nodes as possible. When you
add a new node or a node fails, {es} automatically rebalances the index's shards
across the tier's remaining nodes.

[discrete]
[[shard-size-best-practices]]
=== Best practices

Where applicable, use the following best practices as starting points for your
sharding strategy.

[discrete]
[[delete-indices-not-documents]]
==== Delete indices, not documents

Deleted documents aren't immediately removed from {es}'s file system.
Instead, {es} marks the document as deleted on each related shard. The marked
document will continue to use resources until it's removed during a periodic
<<index-modules-merge,segment merge>>.

When possible, delete entire indices instead. {es} can immediately remove
deleted indices directly from the file system and free up resources.

[discrete]
[[use-ds-ilm-for-time-series]]
==== Use data streams and {ilm-init} for time series data

<<data-streams,Data streams>> let you store time series data across multiple,
time-based backing indices. You can use <<index-lifecycle-management,{ilm}
({ilm-init})>> to automatically manage these backing indices.

[role="screenshot"]
image:images/ilm/index-lifecycle-policies.png[]

One advantage of this setup is
<<getting-started-index-lifecycle-management,automatic rollover>>, which creates
a new write index when the current one meets a defined `max_age`, `max_docs`, or
`max_size` threshold. You can use these thresholds to create indices based on
your retention intervals. When an index is no longer needed, you can use
{ilm-init} to automatically delete it and free up resources.

{ilm-init} also makes it easy to change your sharding strategy over time:

* *Want to decrease the shard count for new indices?* +
Change the <<index-number-of-shards,`index.number_of_shards`>> setting in the
data stream's <<data-streams-change-mappings-and-settings,matching index
template>>.

* *Want larger shards?* +
Increase your {ilm-init} policy's <<ilm-rollover,rollover threshold>>.

* *Need indices that span shorter intervals?* +
Offset the increased shard count by deleting older indices sooner. You can do
this by lowering the `min_age` threshold for your policy's
<<ilm-index-lifecycle,delete phase>>.

Every new backing index is an opportunity to further tune your strategy.

[discrete]
[[shard-size-recommendation]]
==== Aim for shard sizes between 10GB and 50GB

Shards larger than 50GB may make a cluster less likely to recover from failure.
When a node fails, {es} rebalances the node's shards across the data tier's
remaining nodes. Shards larger than 50GB can be harder to move across a network
and may tax node resources.

[discrete]
[[shard-count-recommendation]]
==== Aim for 20 shards or fewer per GB of heap memory

The number of shards a node can hold is proportional to the node's
<<heap-size,heap memory>>. For example, a node with 30GB of heap memory should
have at most 600 shards. The further below this limit you can keep your nodes,
the better. If you find your nodes exceeding more than 20 shards per GB,
consider adding another node. You can use the <<cat-shards,cat shards API>> to
check the number of shards per node.

[source,console]
----
GET _cat/shards
----
// TEST[setup:my_index]

To use compressed pointers and save memory, we
recommend each node have a maximum heap size of 32GB or 50% of the node's
available memory, whichever is lower. See <<heap-size>>.


[discrete]
[[avoid-node-hotspots]]
==== Avoid node hotspots

If too many shards are allocated to a specific node, the node can become a
hotspot. For example, if a single node contains too many shards for an index
with a high indexing volume, the node is likely to have issues.

To prevent hotspots, use the
<<total-shards-per-node,`index.routing.allocation.total_shards_per_node`>> index
setting to explicitly limit the number of shards on a single node. You can
configure `index.routing.allocation.total_shards_per_node` using the
<<indices-update-settings,update index settings API>>.

[source,console]
--------------------------------------------------
PUT /my-index-000001/_settings
{
  "index" : {
    "routing.allocation.total_shards_per_node" : 5
  }
}
--------------------------------------------------
// TEST[setup:my_index]


[discrete]
[[fix-an-oversharded-cluster]]
=== Fix an oversharded cluster

If your cluster is experiencing stability issues due to oversharded indices,
you can use one or more of the following methods to fix them.

[discrete]
[[reindex-indices-from-shorter-periods-into-longer-periods]]
==== Create time-based indices that cover longer periods

For time series data, you can create indices that cover longer time intervals.
For example, instead of daily indices, you can create indices on a monthly or
yearly basis.

If you're using {ilm-init}, you can do this by increasing the `max_age`
threshold for the <<ilm-rollover,rollover action>>.

If your retention policy allows it, you can also create larger indices by
omitting a `max_age` threshold and using `max_docs` and/or `max_size`
thresholds instead.

[discrete]
[[delete-empty-indices]]
==== Delete empty or unneeded indices

If you're using {ilm-init} and roll over indices based on a `max_age` threshold,
you can inadvertently create indices with no documents. These empty indices
provide no benefit but still consume resources.

You can find these empty indices using the <<cat-count,cat count API>>.

[source,console]
----
GET /_cat/count/my-index-000001?v
----
// TEST[setup:my_index]

Once you have a list of empty indices, you can delete them using the
<<indices-delete-index,delete index API>>. You can also delete any other
unneeded indices.

[source,console]
----
DELETE /my-index-*
----
// TEST[setup:my_index]

[discrete]
[[force-merge-during-off-peak-hours]]
==== Force merge during off-peak hours

If you no longer write to an index, you can use the <<indices-forcemerge,force
merge API>> to <<index-modules-merge,merge>> smaller segments into larger ones.
This can reduce shard overhead and improve search speeds. However, force merges
are resource-intensive. If possible, run the force merge during off-peak hours.

[source,console]
----
POST /my-index-000001/_forcemerge
----
// TEST[setup:my_index]

[discrete]
[[shrink-existing-index-to-fewer-shards]]
==== Shrink an existing index to fewer shards

If you no longer write to an index, you can use the
<<indices-shrink-index,shrink index API>> to reduce its shard count.

[source,console]
----
POST /my-index-000001/_shrink/my-shrunken-index-000001
----
// TEST[s/^/PUT my-index-000001\n{"settings":{"index.number_of_shards":2,"blocks.write":true}}\n/]

{ilm-init} also has a <<ilm-shrink-action,shrink action>> for indices in the
warm phase.

[discrete]
[[combine-smaller-indices]]
==== Combine smaller indices

You can also use the <<docs-reindex,reindex API>> to combine indices
with similar mappings into a single large index. For time series data, you could
reindex indices for short time periods into a new index covering a
longer period. For example, you could reindex daily indices from October with a
shared index pattern, such as `my-index-2099.10.11`, into a monthly
`my-index-2099.10` index. After the reindex, delete the smaller indices.

[source,console]
----
POST /_reindex
{
  "source": {
    "index": "my-index-2099.10.*"
  },
  "dest": {
    "index": "my-index-2099.10"
  }
}
----